The DDYPG successfully created several resources to support practitioners in addressing problematic online use with young people. Reflections from DDYPG members showed that creative engagement, meaningful involvement, and peer interactions were key motivators for participation and led to benefits, including feelings of empowerment and personal development. Anxiety, time demands, and potential exposure to triggering content could act as barriers. However, structured tasks, positive rapport with researchers, and flexible participation helped to mitigate these challenges.The findings highlight ethical considerations and potential strategies for involving young people in resource development research projects in the future.
Journalling about online activity should be explored as potential individual-level intervention to tackle harmful online use and reduce linked mental health morbidity, both within and outside of clinical setting. Co-designed research with lived-experience users and practitioners will be essential for maximising safety and likely success.
Our study resulted in the production of preliminary recommendations for platforms regarding potential mental health content moderation and well-being procedures and tools. We also emphasized the need for more inclusive user-centered design, feedback, and research to improve SNS safety and moderation features.
This study revealed challenges in moderating SH/S content online, and highlighted inadequacies with current procedures. Policymakers and industry leaders should prioritise transparent and consistent moderation practices.
This study demonstrated the complexity of web-based interactions for those engaging with self-harm and suicide content, with beneficial and harmful material intertwined. Participants who demonstrated metacognition and digital efficacy skills have better control over their online use.